Login

MaxBlog

This blog is about developing people on behalf of developing your organization.

Subscribe to feed Viewing entries tagged ethics

Nothing to Sell at a Higher Price...

Posted by Jamie MacDonald
Jamie MacDonald
Jamie currently leads “Maximum Impact” a consulting, training and professional d
User is currently offline
on Wednesday, 04 April 2012
in Uncategorized
from the desk of Mary Mershein

Lululemon shares were $2 in 2007. Five years later they were $76 and the company was worth $10 billion. One reason for the growth was the creation of "scarcity" in which stores kept only a limited supply of merchandise. Low inventory levels forced customers to buy or lose out when the item goes out of stock, creating a buying frenzy. Lululemon also rarely sold items on sale, even charging over four times the price of similar items at the competition.
Costco was the first company to grow from zero to $3 billion in sales in less than six years. As of Feb 26, 2012, net sales for the first half year were $44 billion. Similar to Lululemon, Costco carries many items for a very limited time, encouraging customers to buy while they can. Costco does not carry multiple brands or products whose cost is too high, even if it’s a popular brand such as Coca Cola. Costco also does not stock extra bags or packing materials. Products are delivered to stores on shipping pallets and displayed that way, rather than arranged beautifully on shelves. There are also long lineups at the cashiers, hefty membership fees and the inconvenience of buying items in large bulk sizes.
In 1919 the first Loblaws grocery store opened using a new retail concept called self-service, the opposite to the traditional full service. Under full service, store employees fetched items for customers, weighed items and calculated the total purchase. The total was then added to the customer’s account for later payment. Home delivery was usually included free of charge. Under the new self-serve model, customers browsed freely throughout the store, picked-up their own goods without the aid of a staff person and then paid at a central cashier. There was no payment on account or home delivery. As with Lululemon and Costco, popular items might not be in stock to encourage customers to come again. Despite the lack of service, Loblaws is now Canada’s largest grocery store chain. On Dec 31, 2011, Loblaws had annual net earnings of $769 million on revenues of $31.25 billion.
Selling at an inconvenience. Refusing to sell. Selling out. Self-selling. High price selling. Low price selling. Selling directly from shipping pallets. Selling memberships. Creating urgency to buy through scarcity. These are all NOT the typical sales tactics of a traditional retailer where full service with plenty of convenience and a variety of in stock products arranged beautifully on shelves are the norm. Yet, these tactics drove these companies to success.

Accounting does not record sales strategies as having any value even when they are the key success to generating sales and company growth. In contrast, financial statements record inventory. More inventory increases the assets on the balance sheet and the value of the company. Yet it was the lack of inventory which often created the sales frenzy to drive the growth and value of these companies.

How does your company sell its products? Is there plenty on the shelf or limited supply in hot demand? How do you sell yourself?

©2012

Mary Mershein, CA is a professional accountant with a master’s degree in management who believes common sense is our greatest financial analysis. Additional common sense can be found at www.moosemoney.wordpress.com.

Hits: 100 0 Comments Continue reading
Rate this blog entry
0 votes

Is this the end of the internet?

Posted by Jamie MacDonald
Jamie MacDonald
Jamie currently leads “Maximum Impact” a consulting, training and professional d
User is currently offline
on Tuesday, 17 January 2012
in Insights

 

Is this the end of the Internet?  By Mary Mershein

Companies are in business to make money.

Nowhere in financial records is there a place for ethics, morality, law abiding or decency.  Income statements recognize only financial gains and losses.  As a result, corporations are encouraged to maximize profits with actions that may not always be in the best interests of the public. 

This may include dumping pollution in the environment (Feb 2011 Chevron fined $8 billion for damage to the Amazon), hiring labor at slave wages in poor countries (July 2011 Nike employees in Taiwan earn 50 cents an hour) or treating staff so ruthlessly they want to commit suicide. (Jan 2012 Foxconn employees in China) 

Leaders of such companies include the richest people on earth who are frequently admired and respected despite these seemingly immoral transgressions.  In their situation, the end justifies the means.  So why do leadership courses continue to preach ethical behavior?  Why would companies, bent on profit, want ethical leaders? 

The answer is sustainability.  History proves over and over that a single minded pursuit of profit eventually leads to downfall. 

Google’s “Don’t be Evil” philosophy was created in 2004. It was challenged when it went up against China’s censorship policies.  When Google threatened to leave China in 2009 rather than comply with China’s censorship demands, Google’s share price fell by 8%.  

Google backed down and complied with China’s demands.  Later in 2009 Google dropped its “Don’t be Evil” motto.    

In 2011 Google faced censorship demands by India but this time there were no threats by Google to leave the country and no drop in share price.  Now, in January 2012 South Korea is considering adding its own censorship demands.   What country is next?  In the pursuit of profit how far will Google go?  When does this result in a censored internet? 

Will a censored internet even be viable?

Ironically the end of an open internet would mean the end of Google. 
 

We still need ethics and leadership courses to prevent decisions that result in short-term profits at the expense of the long-term viability of the company. 

What kind of decisions does your company make?

 

What kind of decisions do you make?

 

©2012  

 

Mary Mershein is a Chartered Accountant with a master’s degree in management who believes common sense is our greatest financial analysis.  Additional common sense can be found at www.moosemoney.wordpress.com.

Hits: 230 0 Comments Continue reading
Rate this blog entry
0 votes